Hey and welcome back to a new week!

In this issue:

• You Want To Vibe Code. Now What? Picking what to put these new possibilities to use for is sometimes harder than actually doing it. I’m here to help.

• Bill’s Portfolio: Incredibly well done portfolio from someone who is blending strong product and brand design skills.

Thank you for reading!

🗣️ THIS IS HOW I WORK BEST - YAPPING!

Stay in flow state. Dictate everything else.

Context switching kills your focus. Every time you stop coding to type a Slack reply, write a ticket, or draft a PR description, it takes 23 minutes to get back in the zone.

Wispr Flow lets you dictate all of it without leaving your editor. Speak your response, your ticket, your commit message — Flow formats it and you're back to coding. Works system-wide inside Cursor, VS Code, Warp, Slack, Linear, and every app.

4x faster than typing. 89% of messages sent with zero edits. Used by engineering teams at OpenAI, Vercel, and Clay.

Start flowing free

5 Ways to Instantly Level Up Your Portfolio ⚡

If your portfolio isn’t getting interviews, or if you’re still building it right now, these are five things that can make it much stronger without completely rebuilding it.

A lot of portfolio advice sounds bigger than it needs to be.

People talk as if improving your portfolio means starting over, rebuilding every case study, changing tools, rewriting everything, rethinking the whole structure.

Sometimes that’s true.

A lot of the time, it isn’t.

Sometimes the thing that pushes a portfolio forward is much smaller. Not small in impact, but small in scope. A handful of changes that make the work more engaging, easier to scan, more memorable, and much clearer in what it says about you.

I had an impromptu portfolio review session in real life recently and giving advice to so many people in a row made me see some of the most common missed opportunities and patterns a lot more clearly.

These five things are all fairly simple in principle. Execution is still everything, obviously. Some of them are easier to apply than others depending on the kind of work you have, the material available, and the type of portfolio you’ve built. But most of them are absolutely doable.

And if you’re already doing some of them, take that as a good sign. A lot of strong portfolios do.

1. Add motion wherever the work benefits from it

When I say motion here, I’m not talking about motion design as a full discipline.

I’m talking about something much simpler: moving imagery.

Videos.

Recordings.

Loops.

Anything that makes the work feel less static.

This is one of the easiest ways to make a portfolio more engaging, because static grids of screens almost always lose against even a simple, well-chosen recording.

There are two places where this matters most:

• the project previews on your homepage

• the parts inside your case studies where you actually show the work

On the homepage especially, this can make a huge difference.

A project card with four static screens can be fine. A project card with a short, well-edited recording of the product in motion is usually much more compelling. It draws attention faster, feels more alive, and gives people a better sense of what kind of experience they’re about to click into.

Same thing inside the case study.

A static collection of wireframes or polished screens can explain a lot, sure. But if you can show a real flow moving, even just for a few seconds, that usually does more for the work than another image ever would.

Ideally, you record the real product with your changes implemented. If that’s not possible, a prototype is totally fine too.

Then you place that recording into a device mockup or present it cleanly on the page. Tools like shots.so, Rotato, or even Canva can do the job here. There are limitations depending on the tool and plan, but this is generally not difficult to solve.

The point is not to overproduce this.

The point is to stop relying only on static imagery when the work would clearly benefit from movement.

Portfolios to draw inspiration from

Amy La 
Joanna Ni 
Brian Yang

2. Rewrite your headings so they actually tell the story

This one matters a lot more than people think.

And it matters both on the homepage and inside the case studies themselves.

A lot of portfolios waste the one layer of text people are actually somewhat likely to scan.

On the homepage, I often see project titles that are just the startup name, the company name, or the product name.

Then inside the case study, I get headings like:

• Context

• Research

• Competitors

• Ideation

• Solution

• Outcome

That structure is not only boring. It throws away the one real chance you have to get meaningful information into the scan.

Because people do not read your portfolio properly.

They scroll through it.

They skim.

They glance at bigger text.

And if the bigger text says nothing, then most of the story gets lost.

So use your headings properly.

On the homepage, don’t let the project title be nothing more than a label. Make it say something meaningful. Say what was interesting about the project. Say what changed. Say what kind of problem was solved. If there was a strong outcome, point to it.

Make it sound like a story worth opening, not a file name.

Then inside the case study, shift more of the information load from the body text into the headings.

Instead of:

• heading: Outcome

• paragraph: everything useful

Do this:

• heading: the actual key outcome

• paragraph: only supporting detail

That way, someone scanning the page still gets the important story beats.

Yes, this often leads to longer headings.

That’s fine.

In this context, longer headings are not a problem. They are helpful. A large bold heading can carry a lot more information than body copy ever will under real viewing behavior.

How to test this

Take someone who doesn’t know the project.

Give them 40 to 50 seconds to scroll through the case study and remember what they can. Then close it and ask them what they remember.

If they can roughly tell you the story from start to finish, your headings are probably doing their job.

If they can only recall the beginning, they probably had to rely too much on body text, and that means your headings aren’t carrying enough.

Do that with two or three people and you’ll know very quickly where you stand.

Portfolios to draw inspiration from

Lana Farkas
Justin Shi
Rithvika Reddy

3. Tighten your intro until it actually positions you

Your homepage intro is one of the most valuable pieces of real estate in the entire portfolio.

It’s one of the only parts people are reasonably likely to read. That alone makes it powerful.

So don’t waste it.

What tends to work best is a visually engaging hero with one thoughtful detail or interaction that makes people stay on that surface a little longer. Not overloaded. Not full of gimmicks. Just enough to create a bit of interest before they scroll to the work.

Then the intro itself should get to the point fast.

Usually, one or two sentences is enough.

And yes, that is a very tight constraint. That’s exactly why it works.

It forces you to answer the important questions:

• what kind of designer are you

• what kind of work do you do

• what kind of environments or products do you fit best

• what do you bring that is actually relevant

Be clear about your title.

If you are predominantly going for product design roles, say product designer. Don’t stack three identities on top of each other and dilute focus immediately. If you are genuinely multidisciplinary, just say that. That’s a perfectly good framing.

If you have a relevant prior background, you can bring that in too. For example, a background in illustration, engineering, or something else that meaningfully shapes your profile.

Then think about focus.

Are you mostly B2B? Consumer? Enterprise? Startup-heavy? More technical? More motion-oriented? Strong in code literacy? These are the things that help someone understand where you fit.

What you should avoid is vague filler.

Things like “strong prototyping skills” or “passionate about user-centered design” do very little here.

The intro should do real positioning work. It should help the right person understand, very quickly, why your work might be relevant to them.

That’s the job.

Portfolios to draw inspiration from

Pradeep Yellapu
Caleb Wu
Xiaoyang Hu

4. Use interactions to make the portfolio memorable

This one is a bit trickier, because it’s easier said than done.

But if you’re working in Framer or vibe coding your portfolio, interactions are usually very achievable now.

And they matter.

By interactions, I mean any moment where someone does something and the portfolio responds in a way that feels useful, playful, or simply well-considered.

Yes, technically even a hover state is an interaction.

But I’m talking about the more deliberate stuff.

For example:

• a small reveal

• a card responding in a more interesting way

• icons spreading slightly on hover

• a case study section using interaction to explain something

• a homepage detail that adds delight without becoming noise

Good interactions do two things at once.

They bring a bit of fun or personality, and they also make the portfolio more memorable. Sometimes they even help communicate information better.

That’s why they’re so useful.

One thing I always like seeing is when people use interactions inside case studies, not only on the homepage. That can be a very smart way to turn information into a more playful, lighter experience without making it feel unserious.

And on the main surface, even tiny details can do a lot. I remember a very small interaction from Andrea Da Silva’s portfolio where hovering over her social links caused the icons to spread out slightly. Nothing huge. But it was done well, and that tiny moment made the whole thing feel more alive.

That’s the power of this stuff.

What to avoid

Do not let the portfolio feel like a random assortment of interactions.

That happens surprisingly often.

People discover what a tool can do and start sprinkling motion and interaction everywhere. Then the site stops feeling coherent and starts feeling like a demo.

Your interactions should support the style of the portfolio, your personality, and ideally even the kind of work you want to be associated with.

That’s when they land well.

A completely static portfolio can still work if everything else is executed at a very high level. But most portfolios are not operating at that level. For most people, interactions are one of the easiest ways to elevate the experience and create a stronger first impression.

Portfolios to draw inspiration from:

Emmi Wu
Andrea Da Silva
Jackson Ringger

5. Add outcomes, even if you only have partial ones

This is one of the biggest missed opportunities I still see, even in otherwise strong portfolios.

A lot of portfolios show good work, sometimes even beautiful work, but never really connect that work to what it changed.

And that matters.

Because even though visual quality and execution have become much more important, companies are still not hiring designers purely for visual polish. In most cases, they are still hiring people who can understand how design connects to product and business.

That is the job.

Unless you work in very different contexts like certain government or nonprofit setups, most of the work out there is still tied to products, and those products are tied to goals. Growth. Retention. Conversion. Activation. Adoption. Revenue. Efficiency. Something is always being moved.

So if you can demonstrate that you understand this, your case studies immediately become stronger.

There are basically two kinds of outcomes you might talk about:

• product outcomes

• business outcomes

If you only have product outcomes, that’s fine. Those are often easier to access anyway.

For example:

• increased adoption

• improved conversion

• better retention

• reduced drop-off

• faster completion

• improved engagement

That is already good material.

If the project was fictional, you obviously can’t pretend you shipped it and measured it. But you can still say what you would have measured and why. That already shows that you understand what the work was trying to affect.

That alone is valuable.

If the project was real and shipped, but you never included outcomes before, it’s not too late. Go back and ask. If it was an internship project, ask your former manager or someone who had access to the relevant numbers. Even abstract wording is often enough. It doesn’t always need to be a perfect exact metric.

The point is not to fake precision.

The point is to show that you think in outcomes.

And even if the outcome was neutral or not as strong as hoped, that can still be useful. Because then you can talk about what you would do next, what you learned, and how you would try to improve the metric further.

That kind of thinking is valuable too.

Because no matter what kind of product you work on, you are still trying to influence something real. You are not there for decoration. And showing that you understand that makes your portfolio feel much more mature.

These things are simple. That doesn’t mean they’re small.

That’s probably the most important thing to end on.

None of these five ideas are wildly complicated:

• add motion

• improve the headings

• tighten the intro

• use interactions

• show outcomes

On paper, that all sounds very manageable.

And it is.

But once executed well, these things can shift how your portfolio feels quite dramatically. They make the work easier to enter, easier to understand, and a lot harder to forget.

That doesn’t mean they guarantee interviews.

Sometimes the gap is bigger than that. Sometimes the work itself still needs to improve. Sometimes positioning is still off. Sometimes the market is simply brutal.

But these are exactly the kinds of upgrades that can push a decent portfolio much closer to the threshold it needed to cross.

And sometimes that threshold is closer than people think.

🤖 NO NEED TO SCAVENGE X FOR AI NEWS 

Stop Drowning In AI Information Overload

Your inbox is flooded with newsletters. Your feed is chaos. Somewhere in that noise are the insights that could transform your work—but who has time to find them?

The Deep View solves this. We read everything, analyze what matters, and deliver only the intelligence you need. No duplicate stories, no filler content, no wasted time. Just the essential AI developments that impact your industry, explained clearly and concisely.

Replace hours of scattered reading with five focused minutes. While others scramble to keep up, you'll stay ahead of developments that matter. 600,000+ professionals at top companies have already made this switch.

Join them today, for free.

👀 Portfolio Showcase

Today: Bill Guo

Bill Guo is still studying at Carnegie Mellon, but his portfolio doesn’t feel like something made by someone still figuring out the basics.

There’s already a strong sense of identity here. The work spans interface, brand, interaction, and systems, and the whole portfolio feels modern, cohesive, and deliberate. It also carries that maker quality you often see in people who don’t stop at static design. He clearly had a vision for how this portfolio should feel, and then built toward it.

What I like most is that it doesn’t feel like a template. It has flavor. It has motion. It has small details you only notice after spending a bit of time with it. And even though there’s still work to do in terms of focus and presentation, the foundation is already far beyond what I’d normally expect from a student portfolio.

That’s it for this week—thanks so much for the support! ♥️

Do you want your own portfolio reviewed in-depth with a 30-minute advice-packed video review? Or do you require mentoring to figure out a proper strategy for your job search?

I got you!

• Book an in-depth portfolio or resume review with me

• Book a mentoring session with me

• Book a quick 15 min chat to ask a question and see if we vibe

Keep kicking doors open and see you next week!
- Florian